Reflecting on the Developments in Ukraine
Tom Kaydor
9 March 14
The Responsibility to Protect
(R2P or RtoP) is an emerging norm that sovereignty is not a right, but that
states must protect their populations from mass atrocity crimes—namely
genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and ethnic cleansing. The R2P has
three foundation "pillars":
1.
A state
has a responsibility to protect its population from genocide, war crimes,
crimes against humanity, and ethnic cleansing.
2.
The international community has a responsibility
to assist the state to fulfill its primary responsibility.
3.
If the
state manifestly fails to protect its citizens from the four above mass
atrocities and peaceful measures have failed, the international community has
the responsibility to intervene through coercive measures such as economic
sanctions. Military intervention is considered the last resort.
While R2P is a norm and not a
law, it is firmly grounded in international law, especially the laws relating
to sovereignty, peace and security, human rights and armed conflict. R2P
provides a framework for using tools that already exist, i.e. mediation, early
warning mechanisms, economic sanctioning, and chapter VII powers, to prevent
mass atrocities. Civil society organizations, states, regional organizations,
and international institutions all have a role to play in the R2P process. The
authority to employ the last resort and intervene militarily rests solely with
United Nations Security Council.
Criticisms of the R2P include a
"moral outrage and hysteria [that] often serve as a pretext for
‘interventions of the civilized world’ and ‘humanitarian interventions’, which
often conceal the true strategic motives, and it thus becomes another name for
proxy wars.
With the above background, I
think Russia’s move is to prevent further deterioration of the situation in
Ukraine especially where some of the Russian speaking peoples are targets of a
systematic plan for possible elimination. Now that these Russian speaking
people are beginning to express reunion with Russia, it is important for the
international community to respect their rights to self-determination, freedom,
et al. as have been done in the cases of South Sudan, and other regions where plebiscites
have been conduct to give the people the voice to determine their own
destinies.
The R2P philosophy has driven big
powers like the US, Britain, France, etc. to intervene in conflicts
unilaterally (not waiting for approval from the UNSC). We saw that in Kuwait, Iraq, et al.
We are watching the international community's moves on this matter.
ReplyDelete